Influence of Religion in Ancient Indian States
The interplay between religious authority and royal governance has been a pivotal aspect of ancient Indian states, a dynamic vividly captured in Indian literature. The relationship, characterized by mutual dependence yet occasional conflict, reveals the significant role that the priestly class held in shaping the authority of kings.
According to the Aitareya Brahmana, a king's efficacy in his duties was
contingent upon his selection of a qualified priest; failure to do so could
render his oblations unacceptable. This hierarchical structure placed the
priest, particularly the Brahmana,
in a position of influence during royal coronations, where the king was
required to bow thrice before the Brahmana. Such rituals were meticulously
designed to reinforce the subordination of the Kshatriyas and Vaishyas under
the Brahmins' spiritual authority. The Rig Veda suggests that a king who
honored his priest could attain mastery over his subjects and achieve military
successes, further underscoring the necessity of a harmonious relationship
between these two entities.
Brahmanical texts assert that the prince and, by extension, the state, remained under the oversight of the Brahmanas, who claimed exemptions from taxation and harsher penalties. This led to the establishment
of roles such as dharmamahamatras by the Mauryas and vinayasthitisthapakas by the Guptas, which facilitated the regulation of moral conduct and religious practices, marking an inclination toward theocracy. Despite the notable pre-eminence of the royal priest during the Vedic age, Vedic literature does contain passages permitting a king to expel a Brahmana if necessary, indicating that the king wielded ultimate authority.
By the 4th century BCE, a notable shift occurred as the influence of
theological dictates began to wane; the perception of Vedic sacrifices
diminished, and a clear distinction arose between positive law and religious
customs. Consequently, the ancient Indian state maneuvered toward autonomy from
ecclesiastical control by the dawn of the Christian era, ultimately solidifying
the notion that while religion significantly influenced governance, it did not
wholly dictate it.
Comments
Post a Comment