Land System in Ancient India
The philosophical underpinnings of land ownership are evident in texts such
as the Purvamimamsa,
which asserts that a king could not arbitrarily dispose of private lands. This
principle is echoed in the Arthashastra, where the distinction between royal
and private lands is clearly articulated. The philosopher Narada further
emphasized this by noting that the king could not interfere with the ownership
of land held by individuals, establishing an early recognition of land rights.
Nilakantha, representing imperial sovereignty, posits that the emperor is the lord of the Earth, but this
does not negate the rights of individual landowners. The predominant system was one of communal ownership, which prevented the state from dispossessing individuals arbitrarily. In the Vedic age, kings possessed the authority to gift land, underscoring the social significance of land transactions and the practice of endowing land to Brahmins or temples, which secured the transfer of rights to the donees.
In the post-Buddhist period, the tendency toward private ownership of
cultivable lands became more pronounced, allowing individuals considerable
freedom to gift, mortgage, or sell their property. However, the state retained
the right to reclaim land in cases of non-payment of land tax. The legacy of
communal ownership and individual rights has left a lasting impact on India's
land tenure system, illustrating a remarkable balance between state interests
and personal property rights in ancient Indian society. This intricate
framework reveals a sophisticated understanding of economic relationships and
community structure that resonates even today.
Comments
Post a Comment